Apr 14
9
Integration of the Mind – Part Eleven
Without Purpose the Mind Is Fragmented
Perhaps fragmented is normal?
Last time out we discussed a truth that isn’t true for everyone, and which gives us a confusing sounding beginning to this segment – let’s see if we can help bring some clarity so that the process of defragmenting or integration of the mind can begin for you if you sense the need.
Truth (or “reality,” if you prefer), is created in each individual by her or his own perception or understanding. This statement can be the beginning of the end to all judgment.
Many historical figures have made the pronouncement that when we judge anything, we bring judgment upon ourselves. I have had this thesis proven to me as fact in some very uncomfortable ways.
Ryan Bruce, the founder and CEO of SHS Publishing, called yesterday about a project and our discussion turned to some personal areas. He shared with me how, what Dain Heer and Gary Douglas refer to as a “clearing statement” is doing exactly that for him – clearing out some deeply seated judgments about something he didn’t even realize had been controlling him most of his adult life.
Something he said triggered in me the memory of what I had written several hours earlier and which I had strongly felt was guided by our SPIRIT-PARENT to write as the beginning of this segment, but just didn’t make any sense to me as to how it fit. I asked Ryan if I could read it to him.
Does your brain need to be "Defraged"?
What I read was exactly what is transcribed as the opening three paragraphs (above) to Integration of the Mind, Part Eleven.
While Ryan doesn’t think of himself as being a computer “techie” …he is so much farther down that track than I, I certainly think of him in that way. The first of the three paragraphs struck him immediately and he likened it immediately to what had been happening to him related to the referenced “clearing statement.” He asked me if I knew about what the defragging process of a computer actually accomplished …I responded with a quick yes and then realized that the truth was, actually, “no.”
He explained in detail and I told him that it was very interesting because the reason I thought I may have used the term defragmenting was because the image I was seeing as I was transcribing the three referenced paragraphs was of a mind as being a part of a fragmented universe which I couldn’t begin to describe.
I have been “preaching” for several years that when I use the term “faith” I do not mean an intellectual/religious (oxymoron??) system of believing, but rather taking an action I know which will produce results, particularly in the arena of physical and emotional healing.
That action is most often asking a question of the person coming to me for help followed by a silent question I ask our (your and my) SPIRIT-PARENT which is basically …what, if anything, to do next.
Id-entity is a choice. Choose an entity carefully.
I have already repeated a true story in an earlier segment …here’s a quick review: A physician with an M.D. at the end of her name, a doctor known as a skilled diagnostician, with advanced training in a variety of healing modalities including, but not limited to Naturopathy and Chinese Medicine from highly regarded institutions.
She consulted with me because another physician had referred her to me and the reason she called me was that she had no answers for why a 15 year old girl was not responding to any physical treatment; and she had sent the girl to a clinical psychologist whose report showed only what the M.D. already knew …the girl was extremely bright and very mature for her age …does the story ring any bells so far?
The doctor had come to the conclusion that the cause of the girl’s physical problems was an invasion of her body by “spirit entities” …her words, not mine.
Did I cast these “spirit entities” out of the girl? Nope – I asked the girl several questions and her answers told me nothing except that she trusted the doctor, but did find her diagnosis about “spiritual entities a bit scary.
I silently asked what to do and was led, step-by-step, finishing in just a very few moments by telling her to stand up and command that the nausea and lethargy that had been plaguing her to get out of her body.
Dr. says: "We need to get rid of that entity".
As you recall, the girl, her mother, who was also present during the session, and the doctor had all professed having virtually no belief in God. I assured her that was okay because she wouldn’t have the preconceived notions that many religious people have that are often obstacles to receiving healing.
After getting her to repeat one sentence after me and instructing her to give the command that all her symptoms leave her body a surprised look came over her face that made me laugh. I asked her how she felt; her response was that she felt wonderful. I was guided to tell her to say it.
She practically yelled it, “I do – I feel wonderful!” After giving her the instructions I was also given with which to provide her, in case she was bothered again by any reoccurring symptoms, end of story. “Treatment” concluded …total elapsed time: approximately twenty minutes to rid her of something that had been ongoing for several months.
______
Justin Ipov...the magic cat!
Back to the conversation yesterday between Ryan and me – I repeated another of Dain and Gary’s oft repeated tools: “Interesting point of view, I have this point of view …interesting point of view, I have this point of view,” which almost every time I repeat it several times whatever is bothering me gets dissolved just like magic.
Who can explain such a thing? Not I and I also cannot explain the reason that another of their recommended tools, “How does this get any better?” works either, but things always do get better – whether I ask it in the middle of something about which I feel happy and excited or in the middle of problematic “issues.”
When neither of these tools work for me, I resort to opening my own tool box which has tools in it that seem just as weird to many people, but have something in common – THEY WORK!
Ryan insisted that, repeating “interesting point of view, I have this point of view” doesn’t have as powerful an impact on him as the “clearing statement.” We aren’t in competition with each other and we don’t try to compete with others who are helping people. When stuff works for us, we share it when and where it seems appropriate. In that regard, you may want to Google Dain Heer and Gary Douglas.
Test everything, is it Heavy or Light.
Dain repeats something quite a bit that is true for me …if it is true for you use it, if it isn’t true for you don’t. What that is a system he uses to weigh whether something is true for him and me …when reading something or hearing something that doesn’t feel quite right, he examines his feelings further: “If it feels light it’s true for him, and if it feels heavy it is a lie for him.
He quickly goes on to say that just because it is a lie for him at the time doesn’t mean it’s a lie for anyone else, but he repeats it as a suggested tool to help people not to accept what others say just because it is true for the person saying it. In that way you can simply discard, at least for the moment, those things which aren’t true FOR YOU and absorb those things that are true FOR YOU …and for me, an excellent tool.
I’m to finish this (#11) with a comment about two other terms: “verdict,” a legal term which has its origins in a word that means truth and from which we get “veracity” …both have come to mean a conclusion or judgment based on an accurate accounting of the facts: Anyone who has been caught in the snare of the so-called “justice” system, of almost any country in the world, knows all too well that the word, verdict, is misleading, if it is assumed that it means the truth.
If you find yourself intrigued by “spiritual truth” versus “factual truth,” you may want to visit Google again for “Whirling Dervish.” What purpose does that serve, I just asked and got that it points up two things for me that may be meaningful for you.
That will have to be a “teaser” to get us started on Integration of the Mind, Part Twelve – see you then.
bc